contrastiktion
SCRIBE
It is my FIRM BELIEF that it is a mistake to hold FIRM BELIEFS
Posts: 145
|
Post by contrastiktion on Nov 2, 2004 23:07:58 GMT -5
this election could come down to CA ;D, making my Nader write-in meaningful this year... i will be immensly shocked if bush pulls it off... there'll be another recount this year BTW: funny thing happend at the polls... the old guy who took my ballot, ripped off the recipt and put THAT in the box, and handed me back my ballot ... did the same to my pops at first i guess... but it made it in the box eventually and at least it wasnt a touch-screen ballot
|
|
|
Post by SAMURAI36 on Nov 3, 2004 9:03:51 GMT -5
Anybody not see this shit coming?? I knew BUSH was gonna be dictator--oops!! I mean president --ever since the first term he was "elected" into office. The funny, yet dead-ass give away, is this "PROVISIONAL VOTING" bullshit...... My thing is, where is the public outcry? Why aren't people taking a stand? Why isn't this CRIMINAL in jail? Man, FUCK AMERIKKKA.
|
|
contrastiktion
SCRIBE
It is my FIRM BELIEF that it is a mistake to hold FIRM BELIEFS
Posts: 145
|
Post by contrastiktion on Nov 3, 2004 9:20:11 GMT -5
i didnt see this shit coming at all (if you mean a bush win ... not a close (recountable) race)... all signs pointed toward kerry to me... and i think he still may come out on top... this is FAR from over
|
|
|
Post by Os3y3ris on Nov 3, 2004 9:45:52 GMT -5
Looks like Bush took this one fair and square. People are dumber than I thought.
|
|
|
Post by SAMURAI36 on Nov 3, 2004 10:17:44 GMT -5
Looks like Bush took this one fair and square. People are dumber than I thought. He may have taken it, but it was far from "fair and square"... PROVISIONAL VOTES, early voting........They've been up to their usual tricks.
|
|
|
Post by Os3y3ris on Nov 3, 2004 10:31:28 GMT -5
Provisional votes?
As for early voting, theres no trick there. Anyone can do that.
|
|
|
Post by SAMURAI36 on Nov 3, 2004 11:20:42 GMT -5
You do know how the PROV. VOTING thing works, don't you? Actually, no you can't. I don't know if you realized that, but that's actually something that started only in 2002......In all of the history of the electoral process, that's NEVER been done before. So between these 2 tactics, these bastards are up to their same old tricks.
|
|
|
Post by Os3y3ris on Nov 3, 2004 15:25:45 GMT -5
There were busses ruinning too and from my school DAILY for that shit. The lines were longer than on the 2nd.
I do recall now. Yeh, that IS bullshit.
|
|
contrastiktion
SCRIBE
It is my FIRM BELIEF that it is a mistake to hold FIRM BELIEFS
Posts: 145
|
Post by contrastiktion on Nov 3, 2004 18:03:01 GMT -5
So between these 2 tactics, these bastards are up to their same old tricks. not to mention the 3rd tactic... ELECTRONIC BALLOTS... these things were highly insecure, and vulnerable to hackers across seas!.. i few places (ohio, i think) had the computers go down while they were tabulating votes (the perfect time to change themm)... there will be reports in the coming days... but this is a shocker to me
|
|
|
Post by CIVILISON on Nov 4, 2004 20:37:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by SAMURAI36 on Nov 6, 2004 22:27:17 GMT -5
PEACE O: Just because they did it, doesn't mean that it's constitutional to do (not that that matters, since the CONSTITUTION has been in a suspended state since WWII ) PEACE CONTRA: True indeed......That was another scam that worked quite well during last term (BUSH VS GORE).
|
|
|
Post by Os3y3ris on Nov 7, 2004 0:25:23 GMT -5
Whether its constitutional is irrelevant. The question is what the end results are. if the votes are counted, its legit. You have any evidence that they were not counted and evidence that more democrats turned up than repblicans?
|
|
|
Post by SAMURAI36 on Nov 7, 2004 10:13:10 GMT -5
Whether its constitutional is irrelevant. Wow, really? How do you figure?? It's that very violation of the CONSTITUTION that has allowed BUSH to do what he did, and continues to do. If violations of the CONSTITUTION are "irrelevant", then what's the point of even thinking about the voting process, which is the very heart of the CONSTITUTION (supposedly)? If I didn't know better, I'd say you were a REPUBLICAN yourself, with that sort of mentality...... That's the whole point man; votes weren't counted, and that's the problem. You were keeping up with the news, weren't you? That's how that whole "PROVISIONAL BALLOTS" non-sense was slipped in. It was in the news. That's what caused the whole fiasco in OHIO. That's why people are rallying to get rid of the early voting, because it gives too much of a lee-way to issues.
|
|
|
Post by Os3y3ris on Nov 7, 2004 10:28:05 GMT -5
The letter of the law is useless. Its the spirit that matters.
Nah man. Something of a utilitarian, but I still have a moral compass.
Whats the relationship between provisional ballots and early voting? I understand that provisionary ballots are bullshit, but I dont see the problem with early voting.
|
|
|
Post by Kephrem on Nov 8, 2004 12:35:15 GMT -5
i didnt see this shit coming at all (if you mean a bush win ... not a close (recountable) race)... all signs pointed toward kerry to me... and i think he still may come out on top... this is FAR from over Were you serious when you wrote the above reply? Don't you study/post articles, links, information on the Illuminati and other New Word Order groups? What have you gleaned from that knowledge? BTW, Bush has been given license by the Illuminati familes to bring much destruction and chaos in the days ahead, it's his whole purpose of being selected by them.
|
|