the internet

[Healthy Merking]

in a different thread

i mentioned that the internet may be no different than 'primitive' writing on the wall



the implications of this may be that we have always had the internet
but
we have never had a means by which to access it




by that -
i mean that everything that produces content for the internet (namely people)
have always been around
we have always had the capacity to communicate
but
we have never had the means by which to communicate like this

EXCEPT FOR waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back in the day when we all lived in the same place
and
we all looked at the same wall



a shout out to U7 once again -
perhaps yet another example of our 'collective memory'?



perhaps one of the main differences between now and then can be identified in the 'yacub' threads
we have gone thru a period where we werent all living together
and
some people were able to conceal things and hide their actions and intents for a while
but

to use a mcluhan term
we might be finding ourselves back in the 'global village'
where i cant hide shit from you
and there are so many of us
and we are so close together
that if you want to keep an eye on me
you can




its like we put up all these walls
and everything since then has been a process of making these walls invisible



to which i ask
why dont we just knock the fuckin walls down
and quit playing?



give me slack
or
give me food
or
kill me

[jonnygemini]

via: kentroversy

In a sickening advertising campaign, AOL is telling viewers of a media ad that "The internet is one of the most dangerous weapons ever created. A way for the unhinged to spread evil, free of supervision or censorship."

Why believe me, when you can SEE for yourself?!

Please click on the link immediately below:

AOL - Is the Internet a good or a bad thing?

In the upper right-hand portion of the page listed above, one can view two media advertisements --- one that supports the Internet as a GOOD THING --- and one that chides the viewer for supporting terrorism, the Ku Klux Klan, and Osama Bin Laden (who is dead, by the way). This has to be seen to be believed!!

This begs the question --- why would a company that makes BILLIONS of dollars off the Internet --- demonize their main source of revenue?

Well, as I always say, I am NOT afriad to write about controversial issues, and THIS ONE certainly is one of those. There is a backroom plan to use the Internet in the carrying out of a future false-flag terror event. This will provide the necessary pretext to bring about INTERNET 2 --- a sanitized version of the Internet, where there would be NO DISSENT, NO CONTROVERSY, and NO PATRIOT TRUTH-TELLING. These matters were discussed at this years' BILDERBERG GROUP meeting, where members of the global elite were seen by inside-sources to be engaged in shouting matches about how BAD the Internet is for their devious plans.

CISCO, SUN, LUCENT, and other globalist concerns have been quitely saying that they cannot continue to support the rapid expansion of the Internet, and they plan on bringing about the collapse ON PURPOSE.

This is to provide the PROBLEM-REACTION-SOLUTION answer:

Internet 2




WHAT IS INTERNET 2?

Internet 2 is being touted as a performance upgrade in the fancy press release version of reality. However, what these companies WILL NOT tell us, is that Internet 2 will fall under heavy censorship from governmental bodies the world over. All users will be required to have a special security clearance that allows them to use the new system.

WHY would they want to do this?

It's easy to answer this, quite frankly. Throughout the entire world, a great thing is happening. Globalist mass media concerns are seeing their ratings, subscribership, and interest fall through the floor. Newspapers have been caught misstating their subscriber numbers. TV stations have been caught mistating the ratings of their newscasts, so they can attract higher advertising rates.

In fact, in my hometown of Buffalo, New York USA, a very telling thing is happening with the BUFFALO NEWS, a newspaper that is owned by globalist pig Warren Buffett. The newspaper has hired and put together a boiler room telemarketing call center. They are calling their current subscribers to BEG for more subscriptions. It had finally gotten to the point a couple of weeks ago, where I sent a letter to the circulation department, informing them that if they do not immediately CEASE AND DESIST from calling my home three or four times per week, that I will file a formal complaint with the New York State Attorney General's office.

It is NOT MY PROBLEM if this newspaper publishes nothing that interests me. And I sure as hell aren't going to listen to their begging week in and week out. Another tactic that has been adopted by the BUFFALO NEWS is the delivery of FREE NEWSPAPERS on all major holidays. THIS is how desperate these people are getting. Before my wife and I cancelled the paper altogether, we were told by our delivery woman that she was REQUIRED to pass out these FREE NEWSPAPERS. When I asked her to stop and she wouldn't/couldn't, I was forced to cancel the whole thing.

And get this --- all my wife wanted it for was for the grocery coupons from the Sunday paper!

I kept telling these morons that I get my news from the Internet, and one of the callers actually confided in me:

"That's what everyone is saying, that they get their news from the Internet."




However, I am inclined to think that this AOL survey page is a fishing expedition, designed to gauge public opinion. As I write these words, 80% say yes, the Internet is GOOD, while 20% say it is BAD. To a marketing rep, this is very telling information. It reveals that the globalists have at best, 20% support for their Internet censorship plans.

The public is simply NOT buying any longer, their fear-mongering and divide and rule tactics.

Say NO! to Internet 2!


Here is the message I posted to the AOL discussion board (I doubt very much that it will be posted, but I'm exercising the freedom of speech that they themselves claim I have):

My question is this: Why is AOL, a company that profits off the Internet, actively demonizing the main source of their revenue stream? The transcript of the ad claims that the "The internet is one of the most dangerous weapons ever created. A way for the unhinged to spread evil, free of supervision or censorship."

This is outright fear-mongering, and is outrageous to say the very least.

AOL, the true-patriots out here on the Internet have your number, and we are NOT going to stand idle while your company, whose very logo is the All-Seeing-Eye, creates fear and a panic out of nothing.

There is NO EVIDENCE that supports the silly idea of terrorist use of the Internet, and it is the height of irresponsibility to promote fear when there is absolutely nothing to back up your claims.

I find it quite illuminating that AOL, a company that makes BILLIONS of dollars off the Internet, is now actively demonizing their main source of revenue. You see, there is a movement that is quietly going on behind the scenes, where the Internet as we now know it will be SHUT DOWN, and actively replaced with INTERNET 2, a government controlled and censored gated-community, where the user will have to have a government security clearance to use Internet 2.

Do some research, people. And, as has been said already, WAKE UP! Wake up before it is too late!


Never heard of Internet 2? Well, there are 2,230,000 websites that mention it, according to Google.


Sources:

The following sources were used in the creation of this Kentroversy Paper . . .

Globalists Seek To Sanitize Internet (August 10, 2005)

AOL - Is The Internet A Good or a Bad Thing? (January 3, 2006)

Spooky AOL Ad Says Big Brother Is Watching the Internet (January 3, 2006)

AOL: A Good Company or a Bad Company? (January 3, 2006)

Internet 2 website

Internet 2: It's better, it's faster. You can't use it! (June 7, 2005)

GOOGLE - Internet 2 Search Results

[jonnygemini]

via:Boing Boing

Outspoken Chinese blogger censored by Microsoft
Rebecca McKinnon writes:



Microsoft’s MSN Spaces continues to censor its Chinese language blogs, and has become more aggressive and thorough at censorship since I first checked out MSN’s censorship system last summer. On New Years Eve, MSN Spaces took down the popular blog written by Zhao Jing, aka Michael Anti. Now all you get when you attempt to visit his blog is the error message pictured above. (You can see the Google cache of his blog up until Dec.22nd here.)



Note, his blog was TAKEN DOWN by MSN people. Not blocked by the Chinese government.

Anti is one of China’s edgiest journalistic bloggers, often pushing at the boundaries of what is acceptable. (See a recent profile of him here:

smh.com.au/news/technology/chinas-web-censors-struggle-to-muzzle-freespirited-bloggers/2005/12/22/1135032135897.html and an interview with Anti here.) His old blog at the U.S.-hosted Blog-city is believed to have caused the Chinese authorities to block all Blog-city blogs. In the final days of December, Anti became a vocal supporter of journalists at the Beijing Daily News who walked off the job after the top editors were fired for their increasingly daring investigative coverage, including some recent reporting on the recent police shootings of village protestors in the Southern China. (For all the gory details on the current press crackdown click here, here, here, and here.) Roland Soong at ESWN has preserved the original Chinese-language posts of Anti’s Call for a Beijing News Walk Out and his Call to Cancel Beijing News Subscriptions.

Link to full text of Rebecca's post.

Robert Scoble, Microsoft employee and blogger, says:

It’s one thing to pull a list of words out of blogs using an algorithm. It’s another thing to become an agent of a government and censor an entire blogger’s work. Yes, I know the consequences. Yes, there are thousands of jobs at stake. Billions of dollars. But, the behavior of my company in this instance is not right. (...) Why is this so important to me? Well, you ignore the voices of individual people at your peril. And, I’ve been raised by people who taught me the value of standing up for the little guy. My mom grew up in Germany. Her mom stood up to the Nazis (and got a lot of scorn from family and friends for doing so).

I do believe in a slippery slope. If they come after you today, maybe they’ll come after me tomorrow. Gotta stop this kind of stuff while we’re still talking about you. Oh, and to: Zhao Jing, aka Michael Anti I’d like to offer you a guest blog here on my blog. I won’t censor you and you can write whatever you’d like.

Guys over at MSN: sorry, I don’t agree with your being used as a state-run thug.

Link to full text of Robert's post.scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/01/03/microsoft-takes-down-chinese-blogger-my-opinions-on-that/

Zhao "Anti" Jing has since re-launched his blog on Blog-city, based in the United States. Anti's new American host would not likely submit to Chinese government takedown demands, but will be inaccessible to audiences inside China who don't use proxy servers -- because Blog-city is blocked by Chinese ISPs. Anti will email posts to subscribers to get around that ban, and he says he'll also re-start an English language edition at Chinathinkbase.com. Rebecca McKinnon is posting detailed updates on the story here. (Thanks, Coop!)

[Healthy Merking]

now that we have had this internet experience
like what we have here at c2g

it can never be taken away from us


once our brains have experienced this connection of building so thoroughly and intimately
the 'powers that be' can do all they want to try to take it away
and
it will fail


if not by virtue of the fact that the internet has so many back doors
then
by the fact that there are way too many ways to communicate now


if push came to shove
what would prevent people from signing up for XBOX live and communicating their 'controversial' ideas during a mock game of NBA 2K6
or splinter cell


i remember in november 04 i almost had a seizure when i realized the implications of the nintendo DS


for less than $200 US anybody can connect with anybody who is within reception distance of a wireless router and build while playing a game of mario kart



like the dude at vegas who hit the jackpot but had no way to carry all the coins flying out of the machine

we cant be stopped anymore


the only way to stop me is to kill me
but
killing never solves problems







plus i dont think anybody would be that kind