|
|
Post by CIVILISON on Nov 30, 2004 19:03:20 GMT -5
 Has anyone read thos book? Can you provide any feedback? There is a movie/documentary out right now based upon this work.  It encompasses the following issues: What exactly was Leonardo da Vinci trying to tell us in his coded paintings?
Was Jesus married to Mary Magdalene?
Who were the Knights Templar?
What is the secret of the mysterious church at Rennes-le-Château?
What is the Priory of Sion?
What secret did the real life Saunière know that threatened the Church?
What are the Gnostic Gospels?
Did Roman emperors rewrite the New Testament to control the population?These works hold any merit? In Peace, I-Son |
|
|
|
Post by Teraizhim on Dec 7, 2004 10:43:19 GMT -5
Peace Im currently reading the book Holy Blood Holy Grail  and while i have not read the Dav Vinci Code personally, im under the impression that it covers similar ground. |
|
|
|
Post by CIVILISON on Dec 15, 2004 18:11:38 GMT -5
Yeah... the author of your book comments in that movie.
Can you give a consice review of this work?
|
|
|
|
Post by UniverseSeven on Dec 29, 2004 18:48:15 GMT -5
Da Vinci Code and HBHG are both excellent. They are based on the ongoing theory that Jesus married Mary Magdalene and after the crucifixion Mary and their son/daughter fled to Europe and their bloodline continues to this day in specific european royal bloodlines. see The Luciferian Legacy www.thevesselofgod.com/theluciferianlegacy.htmlthe movie coming out in 05 featuring Tom Hanks is no coincidence |
|
|
|
Post by =M97= on Jan 3, 2005 14:34:50 GMT -5
These works hold any merit?
I haven't had the chance to pick up the 'Code' but have read into each of the topics listed there. Judging by the feedback I've gotten from friends that HAVE read it, it sounds pretty potent. I would say it is a good introductory grab-bag to some of those concepts. ...but each of those concepts could consume volumes unto themselves. |
|
contrastiktion
SCRIBE
It is my FIRM BELIEF that it is a mistake to hold FIRM BELIEFS
Posts: 145
|
Post by contrastiktion on Jan 10, 2005 19:20:32 GMT -5
one of the homies is reading "Holy Blood..." he said the author of "Divinci Code" used that book as one of their main references
|
|
|
|
Post by Subtle Energies on May 21, 2005 6:11:40 GMT -5
The book was everywhere for ages and I refused to have any part of it for a long time, but I have submitted this week and found it quite addictive and interesting.
Although it is fiction there are obviously alot of facts and real issues in their.
For one thing I now understand just how Shirk the crescent moon and five pointed star of Islam is.....or maybe how right 5%ers who speak of it representing man woman and child actually are?
I have for a long time thought that the divinity of Jesus was man made. Does any one have any sources about the "creation" of his divinity?
|
|
|
|
Post by Subtle Energies on May 21, 2005 6:13:26 GMT -5
I think I will look into those other two books.
|
|
|
|
Post by JilaAlKhatir on Jul 3, 2005 3:47:06 GMT -5
I can see how it is a popular book. It is an easy read, keeps the reader on edge and turning the pages. I finished it in two days and would have sooner if it wasn’t for other obligations… but I still can't help but feel that is it still highly over-rated….
I won't deny that alot of the issues that were explored were fascinating. Much of it reaffirmed what I had already read about the church. But I think that it really explores the knight Templars and related organizations, such as the masons, as too positive a formation for my liking. I noticed that there was a lot of criticism on the church and it’s falsehoods (some which I agreed with and others that I didnt), however in referring to the priory of sion, nothing critical is mentioned. Rather it is seen as the ultimate truth...
There was basically nothing solid on the true nature of the knight Templars and the masons and so on… They were basically depicted as this truth, love, and blah blah force… We see that they have power economically and politically, but that’s about it.
I think the book didn’t really address anything that revolutionary at all. People claimed it to be a revelation of sorts, but it was typical. At first when I heard people talking about it, the question I asked myself was: ‘If the masons are so powerful, why would such a book be allowed to be printed and become so widespread?’ When I read it the answer became clear.
If anything what we are seeing here is Masonic propaganda and I would be interested to read more about Dan Brown and more of his writing…
peace
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr. D-Resperatation on Aug 3, 2005 15:17:58 GMT -5
A book that i am reading that is much like the da vinci code is a book called Illuminatus trilogy. It is fictonal but goes into many secret society issues, but also funny and confused, but more clever than any mainstream book like da vincci code could ever be.
PEACE
|
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Aug 3, 2005 17:09:22 GMT -5
A book that i am reading that is much like the da vinci code is a book called Illuminatus trilogy. It is fictonal but goes into many secret society issues, but also funny and confused, but more clever than any mainstream book like da vincci code could ever be. PEACE damn yo i am re-reading that right now as well classic pure classic |
|
|
|
Post by Dr. D-Resperatation on Aug 4, 2005 15:49:33 GMT -5
Wow. Can it be? Do you know anything about the authors? Like why there are two. Everything about that book is twisted. I wonder to what degree there is order or meaning to the events, beyond the obvious, or to what degree certain conections can be made, Like for example, Ernesto Tequilla y Mota- is taking over a country, what does this mean? It takes on the tone of like when the emidate sourondings of an author make an obvious intrusion into the plot of fiction, but at the same time, I wonder what this coup d'eta simbolizes mentaly, as the auther is perpetrating a breach of logic in putting forth such a character as the mastermind of a causual hostile takeover. I wonder if this is ment to symbolize an overthrow of the audience.
I just got up to the part where george so and so is with a woman with a masonic tatoo on her chest with an eye in it. That part bugged me out. I put the book down
PEACE
|
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Aug 4, 2005 16:35:44 GMT -5
Wow. Can it be? Do you know anything about the authors? Like why there are two. Everything about that book is twisted. I wonder to what degree there is order or meaning to the events, beyond the obvious, or to what degree certain conections can be made, Like for example, Ernesto Tequilla y Mota- is taking over a country, what does this mean? It takes on the tone of like when the emidate sourondings of an author make an obvious intrusion into the plot of fiction, but at the same time, I wonder what this coup d'eta simbolizes mentaly, as the auther is perpetrating a breach of logic in putting forth such a character as the mastermind of a causual hostile takeover. I wonder if this is ment to symbolize an overthrow of the audience. I just got up to the part where george so and so is with a woman with a masonic tatoo on her chest with an eye in it. That part bugged me out. I put the book down PEACE the book is unreal it works on so many different levels its ridiculous illuminatus is probably the most impressive piece of fiction i ever read both guys worked on different parts of the book and kind of picked and chose when they put it together probably helps with the 'all-over-the-place' feel that the book has there is a lot of nonsense that goes on - but there is also a lot of meaning in the nonsense i think one of the main themes of the book is that any conspiracy theory makes sense if you work at it hard enuf PEACE |
|
