|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 8, 2006 15:00:33 GMT -5
what happens to the robot that realizes that the job it has been programmed to do is impossible?
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 8, 2006 16:24:31 GMT -5
from a certain perspective it seems like the goal is to willingly engage in a battle you have no hope of winning
to set foot on the battle field submit to that-which-cannot-be-defeated
and then see what happens
|
|
|
Post by jonnygemini on Jan 9, 2006 13:50:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by jonnygemini on Jan 9, 2006 13:57:50 GMT -5
"system error"??
or
is the beginning of "artificial intelligence" knowing your limitations??
or
is the only limitation on a perfect robot/computer the programmer??
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 9, 2006 14:02:07 GMT -5
maybe there is no winning or losing in the grand scheme I think my goal is just to keep playing the game for as long a possible hahahaaaaaaaaa the only way to stop playing is if EVERYBODY stops playing its strange that in most "we all win" scenarios many people in this society still feel as tho they have lost sad
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 9, 2006 14:02:52 GMT -5
"system error"?? or is the beginning of "artificial intelligence" knowing your limitations?? or is the only limitation on a perfect robot/computer the programmer?? interesting
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 9, 2006 14:03:15 GMT -5
a strange point of view is required for a strange planet
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 11, 2006 9:27:56 GMT -5
maybe there is no winning or losing in the grand scheme I think my goal is just to keep playing the game for as long a possible hahahaaaaaaaaa the only way to stop playing is if EVERYBODY stops playing its strange that in most "we all win" scenarios many people in this society still feel as tho they have lost sad it occurred to me over the past couple of days that there may be a tremendous difference between 'winning' and 'not losing' in the perspective of 'playing the game for as long as possible' - perhaps this is my beef with a lot of belief systems the idea of detachment does not really seem to be possible in an environment where not everybody is 'detached' or in other terms - detachment means the same thing as self-destruction or suicide (which is fine depending on your perspective i suppose) i think you hit something J - in the context of a population that is playing a game (whether aware of it or not) and understanding the relative pointlessness (or perhaps impossibility) of 'winning' plus the suggestion of self-destruction involved in 'losing' the correct approach may simply be to not 'lose' for long enuf until there is nobody playing anymore or in other words survive and wait for the storm to blow over
|
|
|
Post by jonnygemini on Jan 11, 2006 11:32:32 GMT -5
In the words of Lt. Dan from Forrest Gump,
"Is that all you got, God?!?"
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 19, 2006 23:32:59 GMT -5
there seems to be much less to life than the complexities which meet the eye
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 26, 2006 13:04:16 GMT -5
there is a difference between
thriving surviving and enduring
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Jan 31, 2006 13:12:45 GMT -5
for the purposes of communication
it is becoming clear that the art of rhetoric and debate has completely undermined the use of words in most scenarios
differences in subjective meanings and interpretations as well as the ability to bend words in directions to make one thing appear like something else has all but rendered words completely useless
|
|
|
Post by Healthy Merking on Mar 7, 2006 14:22:03 GMT -5
when you alter the landscape of a moving body
you affect the orbit
|
|
|
Post by Dr. D-Resperatation on Oct 24, 2006 11:54:18 GMT -5
I SAW THE FUTURE LAST NIGHT in my sleeep awake,
and i didnt know wheather to analize it or change it, so i just tried to breath, but the woice of the colective concieousnees told me not breath, but
violence,
didnt know where to go
peace to the kid who blead marbles, i got black beeds crawling from my chi
1
|
|